Skip to main content

Table 4 Hazard ratios for breast cancer-specific mortality risk in Māori compared with NZ European women

From: Impact of mammographic screening on ethnic and socioeconomic inequities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in New Zealand: a cohort study

Characteristic

All cancers

Screen detected

Non-screen detected

HR (95% CI)

p

HR (95% CI)

p

HR (95% CI)

p

Model A (Unadjusted))

2.25 (1.62-3.12)

<0.001

0.77 (0.27-2.15)

0.617

2.28 (1.59-3.26)

<0.001

Model B (Age adjusted)

2.29 (1.69-3.18)

<0.001

0.80 (0.29-2.25)

0.674

2.34 (1.63-3.35)

<0.001

Model C (Model B + Year of diagnosisa)

2.33 (1.64-3.25)

<0.001

0.84 (0.31-2.36)

0.738

2.27 (1.59-3.25)

<0.001

Model D (Model C + Screening status)

2.01 (1.44-2.80)

<0.001

-

-

-

-

Model E (Model D + Deprivation)

2.09 (1.49-2.94)

<0.001

0.85 (0.30-2.40)

0.762

2.39 (1.65-3.46)

<0.001

Model F (Model E + Urban/Rural residence)

2.11 (1.50-2.97)

<0.001

0.85 (0.30-2.41)

0.760

2.37 (1.64-3.47)

<0.001

Model G (Model F + Interaction termsb)

1.33 (0.33-3.18)

0.964

1.45 (0.33-6.39)

0.620

3.13 (1.58-6.18)

0.001

  1. (With stepwise adjustment for age, year of diagnosis, screening status, socioeconomic deprivation and urban/rural residential status).
  2. (ayear categories as in Table 1, b – ethnicity x deprivation, ethnicity x screening and deprivation x screening.