Skip to main content

Table 3 The implementation domain of good practice characteristics for interventions and policies aiming at dietary behavior and physical activity change

From: Good practice characteristics of diet and physical activity interventions and policies: an umbrella review

Good practice category

Systematic reviews, stakeholders’ documents, and position reviews endorsing respective characteristics

Good practice characteristics

Participation processes

 

Completion, attrition rates across stages (and their representativeness)

Systematic reviews: [53,59,75,90,100]; Stakeholders’ documents: [14,118]; Position reviews: [8].

Resources and strategies for practitioners helping them to invite and follow-up participants

Systematic reviews: [3,67,80,125]; Stakeholders’ documents:[63,106].

Strategies promoting long-term participation (maintenance) included

Systematic reviews: [26,47,64,80,93,97].

Training for practitioners

 

Training for staff in aspects of implementation and facilitation of inter-sectorial collaboration

Systematic reviews: [3,53,59,95]; Position reviews: [8]

Use/integration of existing resources

 

Resources for implementation specified

Stakeholders’ documents: [62,63,119].

Implementation integrated into existing programs (available for target population)

Systematic reviews: [112]; Stakeholders’ documents: [14,85,118,119].

Ongoing support from support from stakeholders secured

Stakeholders’ documents: [14,45,72,124].

Feasibility

 

Adoption by target staff, settings, or institutions (representativeness of staff, settings, institutions; exclusion of settings, staff, institutions; characteristics of those who adopted vs those who did not)

Systematic reviews: [39,94,100,117]; Stakeholders’ documents: [44,118].

Feasible/acceptable for providers (fitting their skills; no external specialists needed for implementation), feasible and acceptable for stakeholders, and participants

Systematic reviews: [26,29,39,94,112]; Position reviews: [47,48,78,88].

Maintenance-sustainability

 

Maintenance (effects maintained over time with institutional support; continuation within the realm of the institution)

Systematic reviews: [39,94,112,117]; Stakeholders’ documents: [62,119].

Mutability (intervention/policy is in the realm of community/target group control)

Stakeholders’ documents: [10,44,62,118,119]; Position reviews:[8,48,88].

Partnership for implementation

 

Partnership between agencies/organizations to facilitate adoption and implementation (e.g., school, business, transport agencies; inter-sectorial collaboration between stakeholders)

Systematic reviews: [3]; Stakeholders’ documents: [14,43,72,76,124].

Identification of those who are responsible for implementation; training, monitoring and feedback for those responsible for implementation

Stakeholders’ documents: [43,46,62,63,119].

Implementation consistency and adaptation processes

 

Implementation consistency and adaptations made during delivery assessed

Systematic reviews: [39,94]; Stakeholders’ documents: [45,118,124]; Position reviews: [8].

Adherence to protocol and protocol fidelity monitored

Systematic reviews: [52,59,95,100]; Position reviews: [8].

Transferability

 

Transferability (interventions/policies can be transferred to other populations, communities, settings, and cultures)

Systematic reviews: [29,112]; Stakeholders’ documents: [10,45,62,119].

Context of transfer and transfer boundaries (including political, social, or economical conditions for transfer)

Stakeholders’ documents: [44,45,119].