Skip to main content

Table 7 Results of the random effects ANOVA analyses comparing universal and targeted interventions for health behaviour outcomes

From: The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis

Universal or targeted Pooled effect size estimate 95% CI n
Universal .43*** .19, .67 9
Targeted .32*** .24, .40 96
  1. ***p < .001. Note. n = the number of effect size estimates in each category of the predictor variable; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. QB (1) = .70, p = .40; QW (103) = 97.60, p = .63.