Skip to main content

Table 7 Results of the random effects ANOVA analyses comparing universal and targeted interventions for health behaviour outcomes

From: The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis

Universal or targeted

Pooled effect size estimate

95% CI

n

Universal

.43***

.19, .67

9

Targeted

.32***

.24, .40

96

  1. ***p < .001. Note. n = the number of effect size estimates in each category of the predictor variable; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. QB (1) = .70, p = .40; QW (103) = 97.60, p = .63.
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us