Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessing the adequacy of self-reported alcohol abuse measurement across time and ethnicity: cross-cultural equivalence across Hispanics and Caucasians in 1992, non-equivalence in 2001–2002

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patricia Chou
19 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Kenner
5 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Adam Carle
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Kenner
18 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patricia Chou
3 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Adam Carle
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Adam Carle
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Adam Carle
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Feb 2009 Editorially accepted
19 Feb 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-9-60

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement