Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES & NHIS 2001-2006

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Jan 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nikolaos Tsigilis
17 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Taylor
4 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Manfred Stommel
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nikolaos Tsigilis
13 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Manfred Stommel
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nikolaos Tsigilis
4 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Manfred Stommel
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Manfred Stommel
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
19 Nov 2009 Editorially accepted
19 Nov 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-9-421

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement