Table 2 Expert panel rating of the appropriateness of the definition of each characteristic to assess an injury surveillance system (modified-Delphi rounds 1 and 2)
From: The development of an evaluation framework for injury surveillance systems
|  | Modified-Delphi – round 1 | Modified-Delphi – round 2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic1 | Not at all/somewhat (n = 7) | Moderate (n = 7) | Very/extremely (n = 7) | Not at all/somewhat (n = 7) | Moderate (n = 7) | Very/extremely (n = 7) | ||||||
| Â | n | % | n | % | n | % | N | % | n | % | n | % |
Data quality | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Data completeness | 1 | 14.3 | 2 | 28.6 | 4 | 57.1 | 1 | 14.3 | - | - | 6 | 85.7 |
Sensitivity 2 | - | - | - | - | 7 | 100 | - | - | - | - | 7 | 100 |
Specificity | 1 | 14.3 | - | - | 6 | 85.7 | 1 | 14.3 | 1 | 14.3 | 5 | 71.5 |
Positive predictive value | 2 | 28.6 | 1 | 14.3 | 4 | 57.1 | Â | - | - | - | 7 | 100 |
Representativeness | 3 | 42.9 | - | - | 4 | 57.1 | - | - | 1 | 14.3 | 6 | 85.7 |
Positive likelihood ratio | 3 | 42.9 | 1 | 14.3 | 3 | 42.9 | - | - | 1 | 14.3 | 6 | 85.7 |
Operational | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Simplicity | 2 | 28.6 | 3 | 42.9 | 2 | 28.6 | - | - | 3 | 42.9 | 4 | 57.2 |
Timeliness 2 | - | - | - | - | 7 | 100 | - | - | - | - | 7 | 100 |
Flexibility | 2 | 28.6 | 2 | 28.6 | 4 | 57.1 | - | - | 4 | 57.1 | 3 | 42.9 |
Practical | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Acceptability | 2 | 28.6 | 2 | 28.6 | 3 | 42.9 | 1 | 14.3 | 3 | 42.9 | 3 | 42.9 |
Usefulness | 1 | 14.3 | 2 | 28.6 | 4 | 57.1 | - | - | 1 | 14.3 | 6 | 85.7 |