Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jan 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Scarborough
14 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Grammatikaki
18 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Klaus G. Grunert
19 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Westenhoefer
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Scarborough
4 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Grammatikaki
20 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Klaus G. Grunert
4 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Westenhoefer
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Joachim Westenhoefer
Resubmission - Version 7
9 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
12 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
12 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-9-184

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement