Skip to main content

Table 4 Topics that are addressed in total and by use of protocol, % yes

From: Interviews for the assessment of long-term incapacity for work: a study on adherence to protocols and principles

  

'use IMA'

'use DASI'

'use MCA'

'use several'

'use own model'

N:

• Total 99

23

12

22

20

22

%:

(100%)

(23%)

(12%)

(22%)

(20%)

(22%)

Claimant's opinion fit for own work or other (N = 99)

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Claim and health arguments (N = 99)

99%

100%

100%

100%

95% â–¼

100%

Work (N = 99)

99%

100%

100%

95%

100%

100%

Perceived limitations of activities and obstacles (N = 99)

97%

91%

100%

100%

100%

95%

Actual functioning (N = 99)

94%

96%

100%

91%

100%

86%

Medical history (N = 99)

95%

96%

100%

91%

100%

91%

Private situation (N = 99)

93%

91%

100%

95%

80% â–¼

100%

Activities/handicaps (N = 99)

91%

87%

83%

91%

100%

91%

Conclusion SIP (N = 99)

90%

100%

100%

86%

90%

77% â–¼

Future (N = 99)

88%

83%

92%

82%

95%

91%

General Health (N = 99)

82%

87%

92%

77%

95%

64% â–¼

Possibility to do other work (N = 99)

86%

87%

83%

82%

90%

86%

Motivation (N = 99)

68%

70%

50%

77%

70%

64%

Life-events (N = 99)

67%

65%

58%

68%

70%

68%

Change mentally, as a person (N = 99)

62%

70%

58%

64%

70%

45%

Person (N = 99)

59%

52%

33%

68%

80% â–²

50%

General health (N = 99)

49%

43%

50%

55%

70% â–²

32%

Causes of disability (N = 99)

44%

52%

17% â–¼

41%

65% â–²

36%

  1. Percentages are column percentages and are tested with the Pearson Chi-square test. The contrast is: 'subgroup' vs. 'other cases'. â–² and â–¼: p < 0,05 for significantly high and low percentages. Symbols are based on significance only, not on Effect Size. Tests and symbols refer to horizontal comparisons.