Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Do 'alternative' help-seeking strategies affect primary care service use? A survey of help-seeking for mental distress

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Sep 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Verhaak
10 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joe Westermeyer
7 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Kamaldeep Bhui
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Verhaak
29 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joe Westermeyer
1 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Kamaldeep Bhui
Resubmission - Version 4
1 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Verhaak
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 Jun 2008 Author responded Author comments - Kamaldeep Bhui
Resubmission - Version 7
10 Jun 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
11 Jun 2008 Editorially accepted
11 Jun 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-8-207

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement