Skip to main content

Table 2 Factors associated with intentional injury among adolescents aged 14–17 years

From: Intentional injury reported by young people in the Federated States of Micronesia, Kingdom of Tonga and Vanuatu

Variables

Intentional injury, adjusted OR (95% CI)

 

Pohnpei n = 1442

Tonga n = 1148

Vanuatu n = 2925

Gender

   

   Girl

1.00

1.00

1.00

   Boy

1.15 (0.97–1.37)

1.84 (1.48–2.28)***

1.39 (1.22–1.58)***

Age

   

   14

1.00

1.00

1.00

   15

0.81 (0.55–1.19)

0.71 (0.49–1.01)

0.80 (0.65–0.99)

   16

0.87 (0.60–1.27)

0.59 (0.43–0.79)**

0.62 (0.52–0.74)***

   17

0.70 (0.49–1.00)

0.53 (0.34–0.82)**

0.55 (0.44–0.69)***

Living with parent

   

   No

1.00

1.00

-

   Yes

1.59 (1.26–1.99)**

0.69 (0.56–0.86)**

 

Smoking

   

   <1 per week

-

1.00

1.00

   1 or more per week

 

2.21 (1.62–3.00)***

1.52 (1.03–2.25)*

Illicit drug use

   

   <1 per week

1.00

-

1.00

   1 or more per week

1.87 (1.55–2.26)***

 

1.92 (1.53–2.40)***

Have you been bullied in school this term?

   

   No/once/twice

1.00

1.00

1.00

   Sometimes or more

1.42 (1.13–1.78)**

1.40 (1.07–1.84)*

1.66 (1.34–2.05)***

How often have you been taken part in bullying

   

   No/once/twice

1.00

-

-

   Sometimes or more

1.73 (1.42–2.09)***

  

Other students do not want to spend time with you

   

   None/once/twice/sometimes

-

-

1.00

   Once to several times a week

  

1.78 (1.47–2.15)***

Easy to talk to family (mum, dad, siblings)

   

   Easy/very/difficult/I don't have

-

-

1.00

   Very easy

  

1.19 (1.05–1.34)**

Easy to talk to friends/others

   

   Easy/very/difficult/I don't have

-

-

1.00

   Very easy

  

1.23 (1.06–1.42)**

Teacher rating score (~quartiles):

   

   1 – 13 (positive)

-

1.00

1.00

   14 – 17

 

1.00

1.46 (1.20–1.77)**

   18 – 21

 

1.00

1.36 (1.08–1.71)*

   22 – 35 (negative)

 

1.61 (1.28–2.03)**

1.68 (1.42–1.99)***

School rating score (~quartiles):

   

   1 – 13 (positive)

-

1.00

 

   14 – 17

 

1.00

-

   18 – 21

 

1.00

 

   22 – 35 (negative)

 

2.07 (1.25–3.44)**

 
  1. n = number of observations used in final model.
  2. All 95% CIs adjusted for clustering effect by school and corrected for finite population sampling.
  3. Statistically significant level: * = p-value<0.05; ** = p-value<0.01; *** = p-value<0.0001. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics for each model were: Pohnpei, χ2 (8) = 9.60, p-value = 0.29; Tonga, χ2 (8) = 11.85, p-value = 0.16; Vanuatu, χ2 (8) = 11.09, p-value = 0.20.