Table 3 Regression models for operating profit in 2001, investment in preventive OHS measured with two variables
From: Promoting prevention with economic arguments – The case of Finnish occupational health services
Dependent: operating profit in 2001 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coefficient | Coefficient | |||
Constant | 7.439 | *** | 8.040 | *** |
Preventive OHS in 1997 | ||||
Minutes per employee (log) | -0.050 | |||
Total costs/turnover | -349.552 | * | ||
Equity ratio in 1999 | 0.060 | *** | 0.060 | *** |
Equity ratio in 1999*2 | 0.000380 | *** | 0.000381 | *** |
Log number of employees in 2001 | -0.080 | -0.020 | ||
Log turnover in 1999 | -0.348 | ** | -0.401 | ** |
Age of company | -0.018 | * | -0.018 | * |
Industry | ||||
Agriculture, hunting and forestry, fishing | 3.875 | *** | 3.888 | *** |
Mining and quarrying, manufacturing | 2.216 | *** | 2.249 | *** |
Electricity, gas, and water supply | 0.788 | 0.781 | ||
Construction | 2.081 | *** | 2.107 | *** |
Hotels and restaurants | 1.482 | ** | 1.507 | ** |
Transport, storage, and communication | 1.109 | ** | 1.109 | ** |
Real estate, renting, and business activities | 2.448 | *** | 2.494 | *** |
Education | -3.739 | * | -3.710 | * |
Health and social work | 2.910 | *** | 2.984 | *** |
Other community, social and personal service activities | -0.436 | -0.406 | ||
Reference: Wholesale and retail trade | ||||
Region | ||||
South | 0.119 | 0.114 | ||
East | 0.181 | 0.178 | ||
Central | -0.109 | -0.118 | ||
North | 0.590 | 0.582 | ||
Åland | 0.884 | 0.882 | ||
Ref. Uusimaa | ||||
Municipality | ||||
Semi-urban | 0.198 | 0.182 | ||
Rural | 0.199 | 0.180 | ||
Ref. city | ||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.12 | 0.12 | ||
Reset F(3, 6244) | 5.10 | p = 0.0016 | 5.25 | p = 0.0013 |