Table 3 Mean ABR peak V latencies before and after genuine or sham RF exposure
From: Short GSM mobile phone exposure does not alter human auditory brainstem response
Condition | Stimulus type | n | Before RF (ms) | After RF (ms) | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genuine EMF | Rarefaction | 13 | 5.89 ± 0.16 | 5.93 ± 0.13 | -1.67 | 0.120 |
Condensation | 13 | 5.81 ± 0.09 | 5.83 ± 0.15 | -0.51 | 0.613 | |
Alternating | 13 | 5.85 ± 0.11 | 5.88 ± 0.14 | -0.78 | 0.450 | |
Sham EMF | Rarefaction | 15 | 5.75 ± 0.17 | 5.76 ± 0.18 | -0.48 | 0.634 |
Condensation | 14 | 5.76 ± 0.19 | 5.72 ± 0.15 | 0.41 | 0.684 | |
Alternating | 14 | 5.81 ± 0.18 | 5.82 ± 0.15 | -0.40 | 0.696 |