Skip to main content

Advertisement

We are working on a new version of this page and we'd like your opinion. See an early preview or learn more.

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Ten years of lesbian health survey research in the UK West Midlands

BMC Public Health20077:251

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-251

Received: 03 October 2006

Accepted: 19 September 2007

Published: 19 September 2007

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Oct 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Theo Sandfort
7 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Bradford
29 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Meads
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Meads
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Bradford
13 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Theo Sandfort
30 May 2007 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Meads
Resubmission - Version 4
30 May 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Theo Sandfort
12 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Bradford
17 Sep 2007 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Meads
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Sep 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Sep 2007 Editorially accepted
19 Sep 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-7-251

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, The University of Birmingham
(2)
Centre for Health Psychology, Faculty of Health and Sciences, Staffordshire University
(3)
Sexual Health Network Development, West Midlands South Strategic Health Authority

Advertisement