Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression for self-perceived health and each impairment type.

From: Regional differences in multidimensional aspects of health: findings from the MRC cognitive function and ageing study

  Self-perceived Health Functional Impairment Cognitive Impairment
Centre:    
Cambridge 1.0 (0.9 – 1.1) 1.0 (0.9 – 1.1) 1.2 (0.9 – 1.4)
Gwynedd 1.5 (1.3 – 1.6) 1.3 (1.1 – 1.4) 1.2 (1.0 – 1.5)
Newcastle 1.4 (1.3 – 1.5) 0.8 (0.7 – 1.0) 1.0 (0.8 – 1.3)
Nottingham 1.2 (1.1 – 1.4) 1.5 (1.2 – 1.7) 1.0 (0.8 – 1.2)
Oxford 1.0 (0.9 – 1.1) 1.0 (0.9 – 1.1) 1.0 (0.8 – 1.2)
Age    
65–69 1.0 1.0 1.0
70–74 1.0 (0.9 – 1.2) 1.1 (0.9 – 1.4) 2.1 (1.3 – 3.5)
75–79 1.1 (1.0 – 1.3) 2.2 (1.8 – 2.8) 3.5 (2.2 – 5.5)
80–84 1.0 (0.9 – 1.1) 4.6 (3.7 – 5.7) 6.4 (4.1 – 10.1)
85+ 0.6 (0.5 – 0.7) 12.7 (10.1 – 16.0) 13 (8.3 – 20.4)
Women 1.0 (0.9 – 1.0) 1.7 (1.4 – 1.9) 1.2 (1.0 – 1.5)
Self-perceived health (SPH) 4.4 (3.8 – 5.0) 1.5 (1.2 – 1.9) 1.5 (1.2 – 1.9)
Missing SPH 9.6 (4.6 – 20.0) 2.7 (1.1 – 4.8) 2.7 (1.1 – 4.8)
Functional impairment(FI) 4.2 (3.7 – 4.8) 4.7 (3.7 – 5.9) 4.7 (3.7 – 5.9)
Missing FI 3.0 (1.8 – 4.8) 15.7 (9.2 – 26.8) 15.7 (9.2 – 26.8)
Cognitive impairment (CI) 1.5 (1.2 – 1.8) 4.9 (3.9 – 6.2) 4.9 (3.9 – 6.2)
Missing CI 1.6 (1.0 – 2.6) 6.1 (3.7 – 10.1) 6.1 (3.7 – 10.1)
  1. adjusted for all factors in table, number of health conditions and education