Skip to main content

Table 6 health and social outcomes (validated measurement instruments), studies with a control or comparison group (studies included in the review)

From: A systematic review of the health, social and financial impacts of welfare rights advice delivered in healthcare settings

Authors (date)

Outcome measure

Nature of control/comparison group

Random allocation?

Control group N at baseline

Intervention group N at baseline

Control group mean score at baseline

Intervention group mean score at baseline

Follow up period

Control N at follow up

Intervention N at follow up

Control group mean score at follow up

Intervention group man score at follow up

p-value*

Abbott & Hobby (1999)[79]

SF36 physical functioning (change in score)

Those whose income didn't increase following advice allocated to comparison group

No

20

48

NR

NR

6 months

20

48

0

2.4

p > 0.05

 

SF36 role functioning physical (change in score)

 

No

20

48

NR

NR

6 months

20

48

-2.5

2.1

p > 0.05

 

SF36 bodily pain (change in score)

 

No

20

48

NR

NR

6 months

20

48

1

-0.5

p > 0.05

 

SF36 general health (change in score)

 

No

20

48

NR

NR

6 months

20

48

2.5

3.3

p > 0.05

 

SF36 vitality (change in score)

 

No

20

48

NR

NR

6 months

20

48

-7

7.7

p = 0.001

 

SF36 social functioning (change in score)

 

No

20

48

NR

NR

6 months

20

48

-1.3

2.9

p > 0.05

 

SF36 role functioning emotional (change in score)

 

No

20

48

NR

NR

6 months

20

48

8.3

14.6

p > 0.05

 

SF36 mental health (change in score)

 

No

20

48

NR

NR

6 months

20

48

-4.8

7.2

p = 0.019

Abbott & Hobby (2002)[34]

SF36 physical functioning

Those whose income didn't increase following advice allocated to comparison group

No

50

150

34

29.5

6 months

50

150

34.2

30.6

p = 0.65

 

SF36 physical functioning

 

No

50

150

34

29.5

12 months

50

150

37.7

28.9

p = 0.17

 

SF36 role functioning physical

 

No

50

150

15.5

18.9

6 months

50

150

24.5

28.1

p = 0.5

 

SF36 role functioning physical

 

No

50

150

15.5

18.9

12 months

50

150

27

26

p = 0.74

 

SF36 bodily pain

 

No

50

150

29.2

34.8

6 months

50

150

30

43.1

p = 0.013

 

SF36 bodily pain

 

No

50

150

29.2

34.8

12 months

50

150

36.4

39.4

p = 0.71

 

SF36 general health

 

No

50

150

35.6

31.7

6 months

50

150

34

32.3

p = 0.59

 

SF36 general health

 

No

50

150

35.6

31.7

12 months

50

150

32.3

32.1

p = 0.35

 

SF36 vitality

 

No

50

150

33.2

28.7

6 months

50

150

28.4

32.3

p = 0.13

 

SF36 vitality

 

No

50

150

33.2

28.7

12 months

50

150

29.2

28.4

p = 0.26

 

SF36 social functioning

 

No

50

150

45.8

42.3

6 months

50

150

52.5

50.2

p = 0.58

 

SF36 social functioning

 

No

50

150

45.8

42.3

12 months

50

150

54.6

49.2

p = 0.58

 

SF36 role functioning emotional

 

No

50

150

48.7

40.8

6 months

50

150

36.7

51.7

p = 0.17

 

SF36 role functioning emotional

 

No

50

150

48.7

40.8

12 months

50

150

42.7

52.2

p = 0.02

 

SF36 mental health

 

No

50

150

57.1

53

6 months

50

150

56

55.9

p = 0.84

 

SF36 mental health

 

No

50

150

57.1

53

12 months

50

150

56

58.3

p = 0.03

Emanuel & Begum (2000)[90]

HADS anxiety

Those whose income didn't increase following advice allocated to comparison group

No

28

12

12.03

12

9 months

28

13

11.14

12.58

p > 0.05

 

HADS depression

 

No

28

12

8.21

9.75

9 months

28

13

7.86

9.33

p > 0.05

 

MYMOP symptom 1

 

No

28

12

4.48

4.64

9 months

28

13

3.86

4.36

p > 0.05

 

MYMOP symptom 2

 

No

28

12

3.59

4.67

9 months

28

13

2.41

5.33

p > 0.05

 

MYMOP activity

 

No

28

12

4.17

5.7

9 months

28

13

3.83

5

p > 0.05

 

MYMOP wellbeing

 

No

28

12

3.86

4.55

9 months

28

13

3.14

4.65

p > 0.05

 

MYMOP profile

 

No

28

12

4.53

4.28

9 months

28

13

3.44

4.79

p > 0.05

 

GP consultations in last 9 months

Control identified as next in individual on practice register matched for age and sex.

No

39

39

70

187

9 months

39

39

111

165

p > 0.05

 

prescriptions in last 9 months

 

No

39

39

122

239

9 months

39

39

146

278

p > 0.05

 

referrals to secondary care in last 9 months

 

No

39

39

3

21

9 months

39

39

5

18

p > 0.05

 

Visits to A&E in last 9 months

 

No

39

39

0

1

9 months

39

39

2

0

p > 0.05

 

practice nurse contacts in last 9 months

 

No

39

39

13

12

9 months

39

39

6

11

p > 0.05

 

home visits in last 9 months

 

No

39

39

5

3

9 months

39

39

1

3

p > 0.05

 

out of hours calls in last 9 months

 

No

39

39

2

3

9 months

39

39

3

5

p > 0.05

 

social service referrals in last 9 months

 

No

39

39

0

0

9 months

39

39

0

0

p > 0.05

 

cervical cancer screening in last 9 months

 

No

39

39

1

1

9 months

39

39

5

7

p > 0.05

Reading et al (2002)[72]

Edinburgh postnatal depression scale

Six practices recruited – three allocated to intervention group, three to control group.

Yes

173

88

7.7

9.7

NR

153

66

7.1

8.1

p > 0.05

 

Prevalence of maternal smoking

 

Yes

173

88

25

34

NR

153

66

20

36

p > 0.05

 

Maternal non-routine GP visits per year

 

Yes

173

88

NR

NR

NR

153

66

3.1

3.5

p > 0.05

 

Maternal prescriptions

 

Yes

173

88

NR

NR

NR

153

66

2.4

2.1

p > 0.05

 

Child general health "very good"

 

Yes

173

88

NR

NR

NR

153

66

51

44

p > 0.05

 

Child more than 2 minor illnesses in last 3 months

 

Yes

173

88

NR

NR

NR

153

66

18

22

p > 0.05

 

Child accident requiring attention in last year

 

Yes

173

88

NR

NR

NR

153

66

10

6

p > 0.05

 

Child behaviour problems

 

Yes

173

88

NR

NR

NR

153

66

5

10

p > 0.05

 

Child sleeping problems

 

Yes

173

88

12

13

NR

153

66

12

14

p > 0.05

 

Child currently breast fed or stopped aged >4 months

 

Yes

173

88

31

31

NR

153

66

23

17

p > 0.05

 

Child non-routine GP visits per year

 

Yes

173

88

NR

NR

NR

153

66

4.2

4.2

p > 0.05

 

Child prescriptions

 

Yes

173

88

NR

NR

NR

153

66

2.4

2

p > 0.05

Veitch (1995) GP[21]

NHP total score

Those identified by control practices who would have been referred had service been available.

No

5

5

NR

NR

NR

5

5

NR

NR

p > 0.05

 

NHP energy

 

No

5

5

NR

NR

NR

5

5

NR

NR

p > 0.05

 

NHP pain

 

No

5

5

NR

NR

NR

5

5

NR

NR

p > 0.05

 

NHP emotional reaction

 

No

5

5

NR

NR

NR

5

5

NR

NR

p > 0.05

 

NHP sleep

 

No

5

5

NR

NR

NR

5

5

NR

NR

p > 0.05

 

NHP social isolation

 

No

5

5

NR

NR

NR

5

5

NR

NR

p > 0.05

 

NHP physical mobility

 

No

5

5

NR

NR

NR

5

5

NR

NR

p = 0.09

Veitch (1995) mental health[21]

NHP total score

Those identified by control mental health centres who would have been referred had service been available.

No

12

36

NR

NR

NR

12

18

NR

NR

p = 0.4588

 

NHP energy

 

No

12

36

NR

NR

NR

12

18

NR

NR

p = 0.2312

 

NHP pain

 

No

12

36

NR

NR

NR

12

18

NR

NR

p = 0.0700

 

NHP emotional reaction

 

No

12

36

NR

NR

NR

12

18

NR

NR

p = 0.0466

 

NHP sleep

 

No

12

36

NR

NR

NR

12

18

NR

NR

p = 0.3095

 

NHP social isolation

 

No

12

36

NR

NR

NR

12

18

NR

NR

p = 0.4872

 

NHP physical mobility

 

No

12

36

NR

NR

NR

12

18

NR

NR

p = 0.1312

Dow & Boaz (1994)[23]

applied for award

Random allocation to intervention/control group

Yes

389

387

0

0

6 months

311

303

20

63

p < 0.001

 

applied for award

 

Yes

389

387

0

0

8 months

311

303

26

67

p < 0.05

 

applied for award

 

Yes

389

387

0

0

11 months

311

303

26

67

p < 0.05

 

received award

 

Yes

389

387

0

0

6 months

311

303

8

17

p < 0.05

 

received award

 

Yes

389

387

0

0

8 months

311

303

12

22

p < 0.05

 

received award

 

Yes

389

387

0

0

11 months

311

303

13

23

p < 0.051

  1. *comparison of change in score in intervention group with change in score in control or comparison group; SF36 = short form 36; MYMOP = Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile scale; GP = general practitioner; A&E = accident and emergency; NHP = Nottingham Health Profile; NR = not reported