Skip to main content

Table 5 Mental health outcomes in universal postnatal intervention trials

From: PRISM (Program of Resources, Information and Support for Mothers): a community-randomised trial to reduce depression and improve women's physical health six months after birth [ISRCTN03464021]

Author and year

Outcome measure

Timing of outcome

assessment

Prevalence of probable

depression I vs C (%)

RR [95% CI] of depression OR

[95% CI] of depression

EPDS mean score

Gunn 1998 [39]

EPDS ≥ 13

EPDS mean score

3 months

6 months

3 months

6 months

16.8 vs 13.6

11.6 vs 12.8

RR 1.24 [0.81 to 1.90]

RR 0.91 [0.56 to 1.48]

7.38 vs 7.48

5.87 vs 6.08

Morell 2000 [40,41]

EPDS ≥ 12

EPDS mean score

6 weeks

6 months

6 weeks

6 months

17.8 vs 18.0

18.9 vs 21.6

RR 0.98 [0.69 to 1.41]

RR 0.89 [0.62 to 1.27]

7.4 vs 6.7

6.6 vs 6.7

MacArthur 2002 [44, 45]

EPDS ≥ 13, multi-level modelling

EPDS mean of cluster means

4 months

4 months

14.4 vs 21.3

ORadj 0.57 [0.43 to 0.76]

6.40 vs 8.06

Reid 2002 [42, 43]

EPDS ≥ 12 EPDS mean score

3 months

6 months

3 months

6 months

14.6 vs 11.7

14.8 vs 9.6

RRw 1.21 [0.79 to 1.85] ¶

RRw 1.55 [0.95 to 2.52]

¶

C P G PG

5.9 vs 5.6 vs 6.1 vs 6.1

5.0 vs 5.7 vs 5.4 vs 5.3

Priest 2003 [46]

Depression by DSM-IV criteria

Depression diagnosis during 1st postnatal year

17.8 vs 18.2

RR 0.98 [0.80 to1.02]

PRISM 2005

EPDS ≥ 13 EPDS mean score

6 months

6 months

15.7 vs 14.9

OR adj1.06 [0.91 to 1,24]

6.8 vs 6.9

  1. ¶ Probable depression outcomes for the intervention subgroups (information pack ((P), invitation to group (G) or both (PG)) were pooled and compared with standard care (no pack, no group); RRw Mantel-Haenszel weighted relative risk