Plausible estimate (low) | Plausible estimate (high) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change needed in antenatal HIV prevalence to estimate population prevalence (% of antenatal HIV prevalence) | Change needed in antenatal HIV prevalence to estimate population prevalence (% of antenatal HIV prevalence) | ||||||||||||
State | 2005 population 15–49 years* (millions) | 2005 median antenatal sentinel surveillance HIV prevalence† (%) | 2005 HIV estimate 15–49 years† (millions) | To adjust for HIV referrals to public sector hospitals‡ | To adjust for the socio-economic profile of public sector hospital users§ | To adjust for under-represented high-risk groups¶ | Composite correction factor for antenatal HIV prevalence to estimate population prevalence | 2005 HIV estimate 15–49 years# (millions) | To adjust for HIV referrals to public sector hospitals‡ | To adjust for the socio-economic profile of public sector hospital users§ | To adjust for under-represented high-risk groups¶ | Composite correction factor for antenatal HIV prevalence to estimate population prevalence | 2005 HIV estimate 15–49 years# (millions) |
Andhra Pradesh | 42.7 | 2.00 | 1.45 | -33 | -9 | +5 | 0.63 | 0.54 | -20 | -5 | +10 | 0.85 | 0.73 |
Karnataka | 30.0 | 1.25 | 0.64 | -33 | -8 | +8 | 0.67 | 0.25 | -20 | -4 | +16 | 0.92 | 0.35 |
Maharashtra | 55.0 | 1.25 | 1.23 | -33 | +5 | +12 | 0.84 | 0.58 | -20 | +3 | +24 | 1.07 | 0.73 |
Tamil Nadu | 36.3 | 0.50 | 0.37 | -33 | -14 | +20 | 0.73 | 0.13 | -20 | -8 | +40 | 1.12 | 0.20 |
Total | 3.69 | 1.50 | 2.01 |