Skip to main content

Table 1 Detection coverage of different mosquito larval habitat categories and types by community-owned resource persons (CORPs).

From: Community-based surveillance of malaria vector larval habitats: a baseline study in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Habitat Category

Habitat Type

Number detected

Coverage by CORPs surveys*

  

CORPs

Inspectors

Total

Detected by CORPS (%)

OR

P

Natural Habitats

 

Freshwater Swamp

10

15

25

40.0

1.00**

NA**

 

Mangrove Swamp

1

2

3

33.3

NE

NE

 

Marsh

21

29

50

42.0

1.09 [0.409–2.887]

0.868

 

River bed

1

1

2

50.0

NE

NE

 

Seepage

36

25

61

59.0

2.16 [0.836–5.58]

0.112

 

Subtotal:

69

72

141

48.9

1.00**

NA**

Agricultural artificial habitats

 

Ridge and furrow

20

47

67

29.9

0.64 [0.25–1.66]

0.357

 

Rice paddy

16

19

35

45.7

1.26 [0.45–3.57]

0.660

 

Other agriculture

17

53

70

24.3

0.48 [0.18–1.27]

0.139

 

Subtotal:

53

119

172

30.8

0.46 [0.29–0.73]

0.001

Non-Agricultural artificial habitats

 

Construction

38

43

81

46.9

1.33 [0.53–3.30]

0.544

 

Drain

115

108

223

51.6

1.60 [0.69–3.71]

0.276

 

Puddle

43

32

75

57.3

2.02 [0.80–5.07]

0.136

 

Tyre track

28

18

46

60.9

2.33 [0.86–6.31]

0.095

 

Water storage container

5

11

16

31.3

0.68 [0.18–2.56]

0.571

 

Subtotal:

229

212

441

51.9

1.11 [0.76–1.63]

0.587

Uncategorized

 

Other

67

165

232

28.9

0.61 [0.26–1.43]

0.252

 

Subtotal

67

165

232

28.9

0.42 [0.27–0.65]

<0.001

Total

 

418

568

986

42.4

NA

NA

  1. * The proportion of all habitats found by the combined observations of the CORPs and the inspecting team that had previously been found by the CORPs. Odds ratios (OR) and P values for the likelihood of detection by the CORPs were determined by logistic regression, treating habitat category or type as a determinant of detection.
  2. ** Reference group
  3. NE Not estimated: excluded from logistic regression analysis because of insufficient observations.
  4. NA Not Applicable