Skip to main content


We are working on a new version of this page and we'd like your opinion. See an early preview or learn more.

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Are non-responders in a quitline evaluation more likely to be smokers?

  • Tanja Tomson1, 2Email author,
  • Catrine Björnström1,
  • Hans Gilljam1, 2 and
  • Asgeir Helgason1, 2, 3
BMC Public Health20055:52

Received: 15 March 2005

Accepted: 23 May 2005

Published: 23 May 2005

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
15 Mar 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Apr 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ron Borland
17 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Tanja Tomson
Resubmission - Version 2
17 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 May 2005 Editorially accepted
23 May 2005 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-5-52

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Stockholm Center for Public Health, Tobacco Prevention
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet