Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: You might as well smoke; the misleading and harmful public message about smokeless tobacco

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Oct 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Dec 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Whelan
5 Jan 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Kalmar
6 Jan 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Cummings
5 Feb 2005 Author responded Author comments - Carl Phillips
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Feb 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Kalmar
23 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Cummings
17 Mar 2005 Author responded Author comments - Carl Phillips
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Mar 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Mar 2005 Author responded Author comments - Carl Phillips
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Mar 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Apr 2005 Editorially accepted
5 Apr 2005 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-5-31

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement