Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of patterns of use, beliefs, and attitudes related to waterpipe between beginning and established smokers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Sep 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Silvano Gallus
29 Dec 2004 Author responded Author comments - Wasim Maziak
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Dec 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jan 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Silvano Gallus
22 Feb 2005 Author responded Author comments - Wasim Maziak
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Feb 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Feb 2005 Author responded Author comments - Wasim Maziak
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Feb 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
25 Feb 2005 Editorially accepted
25 Feb 2005 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-5-19

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement