Skip to main content

Table 7 Multilevel linear model regressing psychological distress on mean occupational prestige in the network, gender and their interaction term

From: How equal is the relationship between individual social capital and psychological distress? A gendered analysis using cross-sectional data from Ghent (Belgium)

 

Model 6a

Model 6b

 

B

95% CI

B

95% CI

Fixed effects

    

Constant

67.708

[64.550- 70.866]

67.715

[64.557- 70.873]

Women

-2.713**

[-4.504- -0.922]

-2.708**

[-4.499- -0.917]

Having a partner

1.992

[-0.137- 4.121]

1.985

[-0.144- 4.114]

Easy nor hard to get by

4.843**

[1.823- 7.863]

4.840**

[1.820- 7.860]

(Very) easy to get by

8.318***

[5.327- 11.309]

8.319***

[5.328- 11.310]

Age

0.036

[-0.013- 0.085]

0.036

[-0.013- 0.085]

Income per capita

-0.001

[-0.003- 0.001]

-0.001

[-0.003- 0.001]

Resilience

3.440***

[2.868- 4.012]

3.441***

[2.869- 4.013]

Mean occupational prestige

0.065

[-0.035- 0.165]

0.084

[-0.057- 0.225]

Mean occupational prestige *women

  

-0.035

[-0.225- 0.155]

 

σ 2

SE

σ 2

SE

Random effects

    

Level 2 constant

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

Level 1 constant

182.697

8.593

182.672

8.429

Deviance

7273.320

 

7273.193

 

Difference in deviance

  

0.127

 

p

  

0.722

 
  1. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.