How equal is the relationship between individual social capital and psychological distress? A gendered analysis using cross-sectional data from Ghent (Belgium)

Table 6 Multilevel linear model regressing psychological distress on volume of social capital (number of accessed positions), gender and their interaction term

	Model 5a		Model 5b
	B	95% CI	B	95% CI
Fixed effects
Constant	67.489	[64.388- 70.590]	67.601	[64.485- 70.717]
Women	-2.600**	[-4.388- -0.812]	-2.622**	[-4.410- -0.834]
Having a partner	2.176*	[0.077- 4.275]	2.095	[-0.016- 4.206]
Easy nor hard to get by	4.778**	[1.820- 7.736]	4.805**	[1.847- 7.763]
(Very) easy to get by	8.472***	[5.540- 11.404]	8.469***	[5.537- 11.401]
Age	0.039	[-0.014- 0.092]	0.04	[-0.013- 0.093]
Income per capita	-0.001	[-0.003- 0.001]	-0.001	[-0.003- 0.001]
Resilience	3.465***	[2.899- 4.031]	3.462***	[2.896- 4.028]
Volume of social capital	0.030	[-0.182- 0.242]	-0.037	[-0.315- 0.241]
Volume of social capital *women			0.141	[-0.245- 0.527]
	σ ²	SE	σ ²	SE
Random effects
Level 2 constant	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
Level 1 constant	182.236	8.506	182.135	8.501
Deviance	7383.640		7383.130
Difference in deviance			0.510
p			0.470

ISSN: 1471-2458