Skip to main content

Table 4 Multilevel linear model regressing psychological distress on social influence, gender and their interaction term

From: How equal is the relationship between individual social capital and psychological distress? A gendered analysis using cross-sectional data from Ghent (Belgium)

 

Model 3a

Model 3b

 

B

95% CI

B

95% CI

Fixed effects

    

Constant

67.982

[64.858- 71.106]

68.024

[64.900- 71.148]

Women

-2.755**

[-4.533- -0.977]

-2.756**

[-4.532- -0.980]

Having a partner

1.863

[-0.248- 3.974]

1.838

[-0.275- 3.951]

Easy nor hard to get by

4.542**

[1.571- 7.513]

4.512**

[1.539- 7.485]

(Very) easy to get by

8.238***

[5.290- 11.186]

8.239***

[5.291- 11.187]

Age

0.043

[-0.006- 0.092]

0.043

[-0.006- 0.092]

Income per capita

-0.001

[-0.003- 0.001]

-0.001

[-0.003- 0.001]

Resilience

3.417***

[2.847- 3.987]

3.416***

[2.846- 3.986]

Social influence

0.142

[-0.025- 0.309]

0.086

[-0.143- 0.315]

Social influence *women

  

0.111

[-0.205- 0.427]

 

σ 2

SE

σ 2

SE

Random effects

    

Level 2 constant

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

Level 1 constant

183.937

8.562

183.842

8.558

Deviance

7432.432

 

7431.955

 

Difference in deviance

  

0.477

 

p

  

0.490

 
  1. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us