Skip to main content

Table 4 Multilevel linear model regressing psychological distress on social influence, gender and their interaction term

From: How equal is the relationship between individual social capital and psychological distress? A gendered analysis using cross-sectional data from Ghent (Belgium)

  Model 3a Model 3b
  B 95% CI B 95% CI
Fixed effects     
Constant 67.982 [64.858- 71.106] 68.024 [64.900- 71.148]
Women -2.755** [-4.533- -0.977] -2.756** [-4.532- -0.980]
Having a partner 1.863 [-0.248- 3.974] 1.838 [-0.275- 3.951]
Easy nor hard to get by 4.542** [1.571- 7.513] 4.512** [1.539- 7.485]
(Very) easy to get by 8.238*** [5.290- 11.186] 8.239*** [5.291- 11.187]
Age 0.043 [-0.006- 0.092] 0.043 [-0.006- 0.092]
Income per capita -0.001 [-0.003- 0.001] -0.001 [-0.003- 0.001]
Resilience 3.417*** [2.847- 3.987] 3.416*** [2.846- 3.986]
Social influence 0.142 [-0.025- 0.309] 0.086 [-0.143- 0.315]
Social influence *women    0.111 [-0.205- 0.427]
  σ 2 SE σ 2 SE
Random effects     
Level 2 constant 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Level 1 constant 183.937 8.562 183.842 8.558
Deviance 7432.432   7431.955  
Difference in deviance    0.477  
p    0.490  
  1. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.