Skip to main content

Table 4 Primary and secondary outcomes of studies applying short-term interactive interventions classified as nutrition education and promotion alone

From: Nutrition interventions at point-of-sale to encourage healthier food purchasing: a systematic review

References

Primary outcomes

Secondary outcomes

Connell (moderate)1[31]

No difference in self-reported intake.

No difference in intention to increase intake of healthier food options. Knowledge increased but there was no difference between intervention and control communities in relation to attitude and beliefs.

Foster (moderate) [32]

Intervention group purchased more skim 1% fat milk, water and 2 of 3 types of frozen meals compared to the control group. There were no differences between groups for cereal, whole or 2% fat milk, beverages, or diet beverages.

 

Milliron (strong) [21]

Intervention group purchased more fruit & dark-green vegetables but there were no differences in the total fat, saturated fat or vegetable serves purchased compared to the control group.

Awareness of shelf-talkers was higher in the intervention than in the control stores.

Ni Mhurchi (strong) [22]

There was no difference in the purchase of target foods or target nutrients between the intervention and control groups.

 

Reger 1999 (strong)1[23]

Purchase of healthier milk options increased from baseline to the end of the intervention and unhealthier options decreased compared to the control communities. This difference remained 6 months later.

 

Reger 2000 (strong) [25]

No difference in sales of healthier milk options as a proportion of overall milk sales between intervention and comparison communities at the end of the intervention and at 6 months follow up.

 

Silzer (weak) [15]

Intervention group reported more purchasing healthier food options.

Intervention group reported more reading of labels and preparation of healthier food options.

Winett, 1991 (weak) [45]

Purchase of healthier food options in two of the 13 categories increased in the intervention group compared to the control group.

 

Winett, 1991 (weak) [46]

Purchase of healthier food options in two categories increased in the intervention group compared to the control group.

 
  1. 1Classification of the study regarding risk of bias between brackets.