Skip to main content

Table 3 Cost-effectiveness results in men and women (base case and scenario analysis)

From: Cost-effectiveness of health promotion targeting physical activity and healthy eating in mental health care

 

Control

Intervention

∆ QALY

∆ Cost (€)

ICER (€/QALY)

QALYs

Cost (€)

QALYs

Cost (€)

Men

       

 Base case

11.59

8,352

11.60

8,579

0.01

228

27,096

 Scenario 1

11.59

8,352

11.61

8,494

0.01

142

10,241

 Scenario 2

11.59

8,352

11.60

8,938

0.01

586

69,754

 Scenario 3

11.59

8,352

11.66

8,579

0.07

228

3,357

 Scenario 4

4.05

980

4.05

1,095

0.00

115

190,647

Women

       

 Base case

12.04

7,688

12.05

7,951

0.01

263

40,139

 Scenario 1

12.04

7,688

12.05

7,881

0.01

193

17,857

 Scenario 2

12.04

7,688

12.05

8,320

0.01

632

96,567

 Scenario 3

12.04

7,688

12.11

7,951

0.07

263

3,766

 Scenario 4

4.08

807

4.08

926

0.00

119

266,700

  1. Scenario 1, full compliance with the programme; scenario 2, offering the programme twice a year.
  2. Scenario 3, increase in quality of life as a result of the BMI-decrease in the intervention group.
  3. Scenario 4: time horizon of 5 years.
  4. ICER, Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio; QALY, Quality Adjusted Life Year.