Skip to main content

Table 3 Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics for 1946–51 cohort and chi-square associations between these characteristics and caring†

From: Socioeconomic factors associated with trajectories of caring by young and mid-aged women: a cohort study

Characteristics

Baseline N (%)

Latent classes (N = 12,282)

x 2

  

Overall highest (n = 2,605)

Overall lowest (n = 8,618)

Low then increasing (n = 1,059)

 

Relationship status a

    

x 2 (2) =1.8

Partnered

11,311 (82.5%)

83.3%

83.7%

85.1%

 

Unpartnered

2,336 (17.0%)

16.7%

16.3%

14.9%

 

Area of residence

    

x 2 (4) =4.6

Major city

5,000 (36.4%)

36.1%

35.5%

36.4%

 

Inner regional area

5,214 (38.0%)

39.8%

38.3%

38.2%

 

Outer regional/remote area

3,498 (25.5%)

24.1%

26.2%

25.4%

 

Country of birth b

    

x 2 (4) =27.6***

Australia

10,306 (75%)

79.5%

75.9%

80.1%

 

Other ESB

1,820 (13.3%)

11.0%

14.5%

11.6%

 

European/Asia/other non ESB

1,416 (10.3%)

9.5%

9.5%

8.3%

 

Occupational status (S3)

    

x 2 (8) =45.3***

No occupation

2,655 (19.4%)

30.9%

24.7%

23.4%

 

Elementary clerical/production

1,251 (9.1%)

11.2%

12.3%

13.5%

 

Intermediate clerical/production

1,385 (10.1%)

14.0%

13.4%

12.5%

 

Trade/advanced clerical

1,334 (9.7%)

11.3%

13.5%

12.7%

 

Manager/professional

3,644 (26.6%)

32.6%

36.1%

37.9%

 

Ability to manage on available income

    

x 2 (6) =25.3***

Impossible/difficult always

2,030 (14.8%)

15.4%

13.7%

14.5%

 

Difficult sometimes

3,922 (28.6%)

30.4%

27.5%

31.6%

 

Not too bad

5,642 (41.1%)

40.3%

42.9%

38.7%

 

Easy

2,035 (14.8%)

13.9%

15.9%

15.2%

 

Highest educational qualification

    

x 2 (8) =16.4*

No formal

2,482 (18.1%)

16.3%

17.7%

15.4%

 

≤ 10 years

4,317 (31.5%)

32.5%

31.5%

32.0%

 

11-12 years

2,287 (16.7%)

16.8%

16.7%

18.3%

 

Trade/certificate/diploma

2,599 (18.9%)

21.3%

19.3%

18.6%

 

Degree/higher degree

1,892 (13.8%)

13.1%

14.8%

15.7%

 

Labour force participation c

    

x 2 (4) =26.5***

Not in labour force

3,567 (26.0%)

29.5%

26.8%

24.7%

 

Part-time

4,309 (31.4%)

37.2%

34.5%

36.9%

 

Full-time

4,571 (33.3%)

33.3%

38.7%

38.4%

 
  1. †from latent class analysis; *P ≤ 0.05; ***P ≤ 0.001 (all 2-sided); apartnered = married/defacto, unpartnered = separated/divorced/widowed/single; bESB = English speaking background; cPT = part-time ≤34 hours/week, FT = full-time 35+ hours/week; S3 = asked at survey 3; all variables had ≤1% missing data except for occupational status (25.1%) which was asked at survey 3 and labour force participation (9.2%) which had a high missing as it only asked about main employment and did not consider secondary employment roles.