Skip to main content

Table 5 Ranking the top 10 cited articles related to electronic cigarette worldwide

From: Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysis

SCRa

Authors with year of publication

Title

Source title

Cited by

1st

Bullen et al. 2010 [36]

Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: Randomised cross-over trial

Tobacco Control

103

2nd

Etter and Bullen 2011 [39]

Electronic cigarette: Users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy

Addiction

90

3rd

Etter 2010 [6]

Electronic cigarettes: A survey of users

BMC Public Health

71

4th

Vansickel et al. 2010 [42]

A clinical laboratory model for evaluating the acute effects of electronic “cigarettes”: Nicotine delivery profile and cardiovascular and subjective effects

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

68

5th

Cahn and Siegel 2011 [37]

Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: A step forward or a repeat of past mistakes?

Journal of Public Health Policy

67

6th

Polosa et al. 2011 [5]

Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e-Cigarette) on smoking reduction and cessation: A prospective 6-month pilot study

BMC Public Health

64

7th

Ayers et al. 2011 [35]

Tracking the rise in popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes) using search query surveillance

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

57

8th

Eissenberg et al. 2010 [38]

Electronic nicotine delivery devices: Ineffective nicotine delivery and craving suppression after acute administration

Tobacco Control

52

9th

Siegel et al. 2011 [40]

Electronic cigarettes as a smoking-cessation tool: Results from an online survey

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

46

10th

Trtchounian et al. 2010 [41]

Conventional and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have different smoking characteristics.

Nicotine & tobacco research

44

  1. Abbreviation: SCR Standard Competition Ranking.
  2. aEqual documents have the same ranking number, and then a gap is left in the ranking numbers.