From: Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysis
SCRa | Authors with year of publication | Title | Source title | Cited by |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Bullen et al. 2010 [36] | Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: Randomised cross-over trial | Tobacco Control | 103 |
2nd | Etter and Bullen 2011 [39] | Electronic cigarette: Users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy | Addiction | 90 |
3rd | Etter 2010 [6] | Electronic cigarettes: A survey of users | BMC Public Health | 71 |
4th | Vansickel et al. 2010 [42] | A clinical laboratory model for evaluating the acute effects of electronic “cigarettes”: Nicotine delivery profile and cardiovascular and subjective effects | Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention | 68 |
5th | Cahn and Siegel 2011 [37] | Electronic cigarettes as a harm reduction strategy for tobacco control: A step forward or a repeat of past mistakes? | Journal of Public Health Policy | 67 |
6th | Polosa et al. 2011 [5] | Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e-Cigarette) on smoking reduction and cessation: A prospective 6-month pilot study | BMC Public Health | 64 |
7th | Ayers et al. 2011 [35] | Tracking the rise in popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes) using search query surveillance | American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 57 |
8th | Eissenberg et al. 2010 [38] | Electronic nicotine delivery devices: Ineffective nicotine delivery and craving suppression after acute administration | Tobacco Control | 52 |
9th | Siegel et al. 2011 [40] | Electronic cigarettes as a smoking-cessation tool: Results from an online survey | American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 46 |
10th | Trtchounian et al. 2010 [41] | Conventional and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have different smoking characteristics. | Nicotine & tobacco research | 44 |