Table 3 Data matrix of outcome and conditions for school sanitation managementa

Schoolb Quality construction Community support ActiveSMCc Government support Maintenance plan Champion Outcome
1 (GPS) 0 0 0.33 1 0 0 0
3 (GPS) 1 0 0.33 1 0 0 0
6 (GPS) 0 0 0.33 0.33 0.67 0 0
17 (RNGPS) 0.67 0.33 1 0.33 0 0 0
12 (GPS) 1 0.67 0 1 0 0 0.33
13 (GPS) 1 0 0.67 0.33 0.67 0.33 0.33
15 (RNGPS) 1 0 0 0 1 0.67 0.33
16 (RNGPS) 0.33 0.33 0.67 0 0.67 0.33 0.33
20 (GPS) 1 0 0.67 0.33 0 0 0.33
2 (RNGPS) 0.67 1 0 0 0 0.67 0.67
4 (RNGPS) 1 0.67 1 0.33 1 0.67 0.67
8 (RNGPS) 0.33 0 0.33 0.33 0.67 1 0.67
10 (RNGPS) 1 0.33 1 0.67 1 0.33 0.67
14 (GPS) 0.67 1 1 0.33 0.67 1 0.67
18 (RNGPS) 0.33 1 1 0.33 1 0.67 1
19 (GPS) 1 1 1 1 1 0.33 1
1. aThe outcome of well (or poorly) managed school sanitation, as well as each of six potentially influential conditions, are coded for each case school based on set-theory, where 0 represents "fully out" of the set of cases with the given condition or outcome characteristics, 1 represents "fully in" the set of cases with the given condition or outcome characteristics, and 0.5 represents maximum ambiguity, meaning that a code of 0.33 indicates more out of the set than in, and 0.67 indicates more in the set than out.
2. bGPS = Government Primary School; RNGPS = Registered Non-Government Primary School.
3. cSMC = School Management Committee