A qualitative comparative analysis of well-managed school sanitation in Bangladesh

BMC Public Health

Table 3 Data matrix of outcome and conditions for school sanitation management ^a

School^b	Quality construction	Community support	ActiveSMC^c	Government support	Maintenance plan	Champion	Outcome
1 (GPS)	0	0	0.33	1	0	0	0
3 (GPS)	1	0	0.33	1	0	0	0
6 (GPS)	0	0	0.33	0.33	0.67	0	0
17 (RNGPS)	0.67	0.33	1	0.33	0	0	0
12 (GPS)	1	0.67	0	1	0	0	0.33
13 (GPS)	1	0	0.67	0.33	0.67	0.33	0.33
15 (RNGPS)	1	0	0	0	1	0.67	0.33
16 (RNGPS)	0.33	0.33	0.67	0	0.67	0.33	0.33
20 (GPS)	1	0	0.67	0.33	0	0	0.33
2 (RNGPS)	0.67	1	0	0	0	0.67	0.67
4 (RNGPS)	1	0.67	1	0.33	1	0.67	0.67
8 (RNGPS)	0.33	0	0.33	0.33	0.67	1	0.67
10 (RNGPS)	1	0.33	1	0.67	1	0.33	0.67
14 (GPS)	0.67	1	1	0.33	0.67	1	0.67
18 (RNGPS)	0.33	1	1	0.33	1	0.67	1
19 (GPS)	1	1	1	1	1	0.33	1

^aThe outcome of well (or poorly) managed school sanitation, as well as each of six potentially influential conditions, are coded for each case school based on set-theory, where 0 represents "fully out" of the set of cases with the given condition or outcome characteristics, 1 represents "fully in" the set of cases with the given condition or outcome characteristics, and 0.5 represents maximum ambiguity, meaning that a code of 0.33 indicates more out of the set than in, and 0.67 indicates more in the set than out.
^bGPS = Government Primary School; RNGPS = Registered Non-Government Primary School.
^cSMC = School Management Committee

ISSN: 1471-2458