Skip to main content

Table 2 Attitudes (concerns, ease, and preference) regarding self-sampling, among women who provided a self-collected vaginal sample (number and percent)

From: Acceptability of self-collection sampling for HPV-DNA testing in low-resource settings: a mixed methods approach

 

All sites (N = 3,464)

Rural Uttar Pradesh (N = 937)

Hyderabad (N = 912)

Nicaragua (N = 704)

Uganda (N = 911)

Pvalue

Concerns about taking self vaginal sample*

      

  Hurting oneself

1,804 (55.1)

374 (40.0)

793 (87.8)

355 (65.1)

282 (31.5)

<0.001

  Not getting a good sample

822 (25.1)

154 (16.5)

79 (8.7)

165 (30.3)

424 (47.4)

<0.001

  Dropping the brush/equipment to collect the sample

138 (4.2)

24 (2.6)

49 (5.4)

3 (0.6)

62 (6.9)

<0.001

  Other

26 (0.8)

3 (0.3)

0 (0)

20 (3.7)

3 (0.3)

<0.001

  No concern

561 (17.1)

383 (41.0)

0 (0)

22 (4.0)

156 (17.4)

<0.001

Ease of taking self vaginal sample

      

  Easy

2,597 (75.0)

672 (71.7)

489 (53.6)

619 (88.3)

817 (89.7)

<0.001

  Neutral

704 (20.3)

260 (27.8)

300 (32.9)

53 (7.6)

91 (10.0)

 

  Difficult

160 (4.6)

5 (0.5)

123 (13.5)

29 (4.1)

3 (0.3)

 

  No response

3 (0.1)

0 (0)

0 (0)

3 (0.4)

0 (0)

 

Preferred collector of vaginal sample

      

  Self

2,683 (77.5)

872 (93.1)

871 (95.5)

352 (50.0)

588 (64.5)

<0.001

  Provider

781 (22.5)

65 (6.9)

41 (4.5)

352 (50.0)

323 (35.5)

 
  1. *Categories are not mutually exclusive; Women could select more than one response category.
  2. Percent’s are based on how many women answered the question; women that did not answer the question were excluded (All sites (N = 150); Rural Uttar Pradesh (N = 1); Hyderabad (N = 0); Nicaragua (N = 149) and Uganda (N = 0)), and women that checked more than one response were accounted for (All sites (N = 37); Rural Uttar Pradesh (N = 2); Hyderabad (N = 9); Nicaragua (N = 10) and Uganda (N = 16)), resulting in a sample size of: All sites (N = 3,277); Rural Uttar Pradesh (N = 934); Hyderabad (N = 903); Nicaragua (N = 545) and Uganda (N = 895)).
  3. P value comparing the distribution among study sites.