Table 2 Finalization of themes after deductive and inductive reasoning
Status of a priorithemes after deductive reasoning | |
|---|---|
A priori themes retained as such | |
1. | Awareness |
2. | Self-evaluation |
3. | Helpful relationships |
4. | Perceived seriousness |
5. | Personal modifiers |
6. | Attitude |
A priori themes retained with modifications | |
1. | Identifying stages-of-change: the definition modified to identify only three stages: pre-contemplation, intention and action |
2. | Household efficacy: modification of ‘self-efficacy’ |
3. | Decisional balance: combination of ‘perceived pros and cons’, ‘perceived benefits’ and ‘perceived barriers’ |
4. | Substitution opportunities: modification of ‘substitution’ |
5. | Perceived risk: modification of ‘perceived susceptibility’ |
6. | Perceived societal response: modification of ‘subjective norms’ |
7. | Cues to action: modification of ‘perceived facilitators’ |
Excluded a priori themes | |
1. | Emotional reaction |
2. | Effect of behaviour on others |
3. | Social alternatives for the disadvantaged |
4. | Identifying temptations |
5. | Reinforcement or rewards |
6. | Commitment |
7. | Goal setting |
New themes identified after inductive reasoning | |
1. | Accessibility |
2. | Perceived needs and preferences |
3. | Societal norms |
4. | Perceived household response |