Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Ethical considerations of worksite health promotion: an exploration of stakeholders’ views

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Feb 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jantien van Berkel
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jantien van Berkel
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jantien van Berkel
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Kottke
17 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Panayota Sourtzi
12 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jantien van Berkel
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jantien van Berkel
Resubmission - Version 6
2 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jantien van Berkel
Resubmission - Version 7
2 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
8 May 2014 Editorially accepted
16 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-14-458

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement