Skip to main content

Table 4 Multilevel odds ratios (95%CI) for poor self-rated health, area-level PBD model

From: Individualized and institutionalized residential place-based discrimination and self-rated health: a cross-sectional study of the working-age general population in Osaka city, Japan

  

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

  

Unadjusted model

Age- and sex-adjusted model

Age, sex and corresponding individual-level factor-adjusted modela

Age, sex, PBD and SES-adjusted modelb

  

ORs

95%CI

ORs

95%CI

ORs

95%CI

ORs

95%CI

Fixed effects

         

Area-level PBD, aggregatedc

Lowest (reference)

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

(ALPBD)

2nd

1.26

0.89, 1.77

1.23

0.85, 1.74

1.21

0.85, 1.72

1.18

0.83, 1.68

 

3rd

1.43

1.03, 2.00

1.42

1.01, 1.99

1.38d

0.99, 1.92

1.31d

0.93, 1.84

 

Highest

1.84

1.35, 2.52

1.76

1.29, 2.43

1.57

1.13, 2.18

1.32d

0.95, 1.86

Age group

25-34 (reference)

  

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 
 

35-44

  

1.35d

0.96, 1.92

1.35d

0.96, 1.92

1.36d

0.96, 1.95

 

45-54

  

1.86

1.31, 2.65

1.83

1.29, 2.61

2.06

1.44, 2.95

 

55-65

  

2.20

1.59, 3.08

2.22

1.61, 3.11

1.86

1.32, 2.66

Sex

Male (reference)

  

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 
 

Female

  

0.74

0.59, 0.91

0.72

0.58, 0.89

0.61

0.48, 0.76

Individual-level perceived PBD

No (reference)

    

1.00

 

1.00

 
 

Yes

    

1.79

1.21, 2.62

1.89

1.33, 2.81

Working status

Working (reference)

      

1.00

 
 

Not working

      

2.74

2.08, 3.59

 

Unemployed

      

2.28

1.50, 3.42

Housing tenure

Home owner (reference)

      

1.00

 
 

Not home owner

      

1.83

1.45, 2.30

Education attainment

College or more (reference)

      

1.00

 
 

High school or less

      

1.44

1.14, 1.81

Random effects

         

Area-level variancee

 

0.047

0.044

0.040

0.036

Deviance information criterionf

 

2301.4

2273.0

2266.7

2170.8

  1. Abbreviations: CI credible interval, ORs Odds ratios, PBD place-based discrimination, SES socioeconomic status.
  2. aIndividual-level perceived PBD was adjusted as a corresponding individual-level factor in this case in addition to age and sex.
  3. bAge, sex, individual-level perceived PBD, working status, housing tenure and education attainment were adjusted.
  4. cThe term “aggregated” means area-level aggregates (%) of survey positive responses for individual-level place-based discrimination within each tract.
  5. dStatistical significance of P < 0.1 (marginal significance).
  6. eArea-level variance means the extent of variability between areas after fixed effects adjustments.
  7. fDeviance information criterion was used to compare the goodness-of-fit of each model. Generally, lower estimates means good fit.