Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Common risk factor approach to address socioeconomic inequality in the oral health of preschool children – a prospective cohort study

  • Loc G Do1Email author,
  • Jane A Scott2,
  • W Murray Thomson3,
  • John W Stamm4,
  • Andrew J Rugg-Gunn5,
  • Steven M Levy6,
  • Ching Wong1,
  • Gemma Devenish2,
  • Diep H Ha1 and
  • A John Spencer1
BMC Public Health201414:429

Received: 19 April 2014

Accepted: 29 April 2014

Published: 6 May 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
19 Apr 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Loc Do
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Apr 2014 Editorially accepted
6 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-14-429

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Curtin University, Perth, Australia
University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
The University of Iowa, Iowa city, USA