Skip to main content

Table 2 The adjusted (least-square) mean changes of the food outlets across local contextual factors in the U.S. from 2000 to 2001

From: The changing food outlet distributions and local contextual factors in the United States

  

ΔSupermarkets

 

ΔSmall grocery stores

 

ΔConvenience stores

 
  

Expected changea

95% CI

 

Expected changea

95% CI

 

Expected changea

95% CI

 

Race composition

 

White-predominant

- 0.010

(- 0.016 ,

- 0.004)

 

+0.001

(- 0.012 ,

+0.014)

H

+0.070

(+0.054 ,

+0.087)

H

 

Black-predominant

- 0.012

(- 0.033 ,

+0.008)

 

+0.019

(- 0.028 ,

+0.067)

H

+0.026

(- 0.034 ,

+0.086)

H

 

Hispanic-predominant

- 0.026

(- 0.051 ,

- 0.001)

 

+0.160

(+0.102 ,

+0.218)

W,B,M

- 0.160

(- 0.234 ,

- 0.086)

W,B,M

 

Mixed

+0.004

(- 0.017 ,

+0.024)

 

- 0.020

(- 0.067 ,

+0.026)

H

- 0.004

(- 0.064 ,

+0.055)

H

Urbanization level

 

Rural

- 0.010

(- 0.022 ,

+0.002)

 

+0.048

(+0.020 ,

+0.075)

 

- 0.044

(- 0.078 ,

- 0.009)

 
 

Suburban

- 0.016

(- 0.031 ,

+0.000)

 

+0.027

(- 0.009 ,

+0.063)

 

+0.009

(- 0.037 ,

+0.055)

 
 

Urban

- 0.008

(- 0.021 ,

+0.005)

 

+0.046

(+0.016 ,

+0.076)

 

- 0.016

(- 0.054 ,

+0.022)

 

Foreign born population% tertiles

 

1 (Bottom tertile)

- 0.008

(- 0.021 ,

+0.005)

 

+0.037

(+0.006 ,

+0.067)

 

- 0.037

(- 0.075 ,

+0.002)

 
 

2 (Middle tertile)

- 0.014

(- 0.026 ,

- 0.001)

 

+0.040

(+0.012 ,

+0.069)

 

- 0.014

(- 0.050 ,

+0.022)

 
 

3 (Top tertile)

- 0.012

(- 0.024 ,

+0.000)

 

+0.043

(+0.016 ,

+0.071)

 

- 0.000

(- 0.036 ,

+0.035)

 
  

p trend = .049

  

p trend = .678

  

p trend = .064

  

Poverty rate% tertiles

 

1 (Bottom tertile)

+0.001

(- 0.013 ,

+0.014)

2, 3

+0.029

(- 0.001 ,

+0.060)

 

- 0.015

(- 0.054 ,

+0.024)

 
 

2 (Middle tertile)

- 0.016

(- 0.029 ,

- 0.003)

1

+0.045

(+0.016 ,

+0.074)

 

- 0.008

(- 0.045 ,

+0.028)

 
 

3 (Top tertile)

- 0.018

(- 0.029 ,

- 0.008)

1

+0.046

(+0.022 ,

+0.070)

 

- 0.028

(- 0.058 ,

+0.003)

 
  

p trend = .002

  

p trend = .199

  

p trend = .461

  
  

ΔFresh/specialty food markets

 

ΔFull-service restaurants

 

ΔCarry-out restaurants

 
  

Expected changea

95% CI

 

Expected changea

95% CI

 

Expected changea

95% CI

 

Race composition

 

White-predominant

+0.010

(+0.003 ,

+0.016)

 

- 0.018

(- 0.043 ,

+0.007)

 

+0.096

(+0.070 ,

+0.123)

 
 

Black-predominant

- 0.011

(- 0.034 ,

+0.012)

H

- 0.050

(- 0.140 ,

+0.039)

 

+0.155

(+0.062 ,

+0.249)

 
 

Hispanic-predominant

+0.050

(+0.022 ,

+0.078)

B

- 0.044

(- 0.154 ,

+0.067)

 

+0.133

(+0.018 ,

+0.248)

 
 

Mixed

+0.013

(- 0.009 ,

+0.036)

 

+0.069

(- 0.020 ,

+0.157)

 

+0.177

(+0.085 ,

+0.270)

 

Urbanization level

 

Rural

+0.016

(+0.002 ,

+0.029)

 

+0.007

(- 0.044 ,

+0.059)

 

+0.158

(+0.104 ,

+0.211)

 
 

Suburban

+0.014

(- 0.004 ,

+0.032)

 

- 0.078

(- 0.147 ,

- 0.009)

U

+0.075

(+0.003 ,

+0.146)

U

 

Urban

+0.017

(+0.002 ,

+0.031)

 

+0.038

(- 0.019 ,

+0.095)

S

+0.190

(+0.130 ,

+0.249)

S

Foreign born population% tertiles

 

1 (Bottom tertile)

+0.016

(+0.001 ,

+0.031)

 

- 0.017

(- 0.075 ,

+0.041)

 

+0.151

(+0.091 ,

+0.212)

 
 

2 (Middle tertile)

+0.014

(+0.000 ,

+0.028)

 

- 0.026

(- 0.080 ,

+0.029)

 

+0.123

(+0.067 ,

+0.180)

 
 

3 (Top tertile)

+0.016

(+0.003 ,

+0.030)

 

+0.010

(- 0.043 ,

+0.062)

 

+0.147

(+0.092 ,

+0.202)

 
  

p trend = .988

  

p trend = .435

  

p trend = .802

  

Poverty rate% tertiles

 

1 (Bottom tertile)

+0.018

(+0.003 ,

+0.033)

 

+0.002

(- 0.057 ,

+0.060)

 

+0.211

(+0.150 ,

+0.272)

2,3

 

2 (Middle tertile)

+0.013

(- 0.001 ,

+0.027)

 

- 0.016

(- 0.071 ,

+0.039)

 

+0.132

(+0.075 ,

+0.190)

1

 

3 (Top tertile)

+0.015

(+0.004 ,

+0.027)

 

- 0.019

(- 0.064 ,

+0.027)

 

+0.078

(+0.031 ,

+0.126)

1

  

p trend = .600

  

p trend = .436

  

p trend < .001

  
  1. aExpected change per ZCTA5 area during 2000–2001.
  2. Supermarkets are the grocery stores of > =50 employees, while small grocery stores are those of <10 employees.
  3. Linear regression models were fitted, adjusted for total population, race/ethnicity composition categories, poverty rate tertiles,% of foreign born population tertiles, urbanization categories, total business size in 2000, the change in business size from 2000 to 2001, region.
  4. W, B, H, M indicate significant difference from the White-, Black-, Hispanic-predominant or Mixed race/ethnicity areas; S, U indicate significant difference from suburban or urban areas; 1, 2, 3 indicate significant difference from the tertile 1, 2, or 3. (p < 0.005 to account for multiple pair-wise comparison).