Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perceived problems with computer gaming and internet use among adolescents: measurement tool for non-clinical survey studies

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Bjørn E. Holstein
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel King
2 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Róbert Urbán
3 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Kaess
13 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bjørn E. Holstein
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Kaess
30 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel King
9 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bjørn E. Holstein
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel King
1 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bjørn E. Holstein
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
7 Apr 2014 Editorially accepted
15 Apr 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-14-361

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement