From: The effects of food advertising and cognitive load on food choices
Ā | Number of caloriesa | Number of unhealthy snacksb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ā | Coefficient | [95% Confidence interval]c | Coefficient | [95% Confidence interval]c |
Model 1: Food advertising alone | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā |
āFood advertising | 65 | [10 ā 121] | 1.28 | [1.07 ā 1.53] |
Model 2: Food advertising with additional controls d | Ā | Ā | Ā | |
āFood advertising | 67 | [11 ā 122] | 1.28 | [1.07 ā 1.53] |
āFemale | -2 | [ā66 ā 62] | 1.00 | [0.82 ā 1.23] |
āForeign | 211 | [53 ā 369] | 1.99 | [1.16 ā 3.43] |
āHigh income | 130 | [ā18 ā 278] | 1.44 | [0.85 ā 2.45] |
āLow income | 178 | [28 ā 327] | 1.80 | [1.05 ā 3.07] |
āDiet quality | 19 | [ā17 ā 54] | 1.03 | [0.92 ā 1.15] |
āFast food | -3 | [ā18 ā 12] | 1.00 | [0.95 ā 1.04] |
āRegular exercise | -39 | [ā97 ā 19] | 0.91 | [0.76 ā 1.10] |
āYear degree expected | 1.6 | [ā21 ā 24] | 1.03 | [0.95 ā 1.10] |
Model 3: Food advertising with interaction effect | Ā | Ā | Ā | |
āFood advertising | 36 | [ā43 ā 114] | 1.14 | [0.89 ā 1.47] |
āHigh cognitive load | -22 | [ā101 ā 57] | 0.85 | [0.65 ā 1.11] |
āFood advertisingā+āHigh cognitive load | 59 | [ā51 ā 169] | 1.25 | [0.88 ā 1.79] |
Equivalence tests: | Ā | Ā | Ā | Ā |
āInteractionāā¤ā50Ā kcal | Ā | p-valueā=ā0.56 | Ā | Ā |
āInteraction effect has a rate ratioāā¤ā1.25 | Ā | Ā | p-valueā=ā0.50 |