Skip to content


BMC Public Health

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A comparison of risk and protective factors related to suicide ideation among residents and specialists in academic medicine

  • Mari Eneroth1,
  • Marie Gustafsson Sendén1,
  • Lise T Løvseth3,
  • Karin Schenck-Gustafsson2 and
  • Ann Fridner1, 2Email author
BMC Public Health201414:271

Received: 8 January 2014

Accepted: 20 March 2014

Published: 22 March 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Jan 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Myers
4 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Ann Fridner
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Mar 2014 Editorially accepted
22 Mar 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-14-271

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Psychology, Stockholm University
Centre of Gender Medicine, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet
Department of Research and Development, St. Olavs University Hospital