Traditional and cyberbullying victimization as correlates of psychosocial distress and barriers to a healthy lifestyle among severely obese adolescents – a matched case–control study on prevalence and results from a cross-sectional study

Table 5 Prediction of healthy lifestyle barriers and facilitators by traditional victimization and cybervictimization among obese youth, controlled for demographic variables

	Odds ratio OR (95% CI)
	Avoidance and emotional coping	Problem-solving coping	Motivation for physical activity
Unadjusted OR
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Traditional victimization (victim)^a	3.007 (1.244-7.266)*	1.919 (0.718-5.132)	0.388 (0.160-0.946)*
Unadjusted OR
	Model 4	Model 5	Model 6
Cybervictimization (victim)^b	1.815 (0.616-5.350)	1.313 (0.391-4.408)	0.858 (0.292-2.522)
Adjusted OR
	Model 7	Model 8	Model 9
Traditional victimization (victim)^a	3.620 (1.291-10.151)*	2.001 (0.683-5.865)	0.217 (0.069-0.677)**
Cybervictimization (victim)^b	1.160 (0.326-4.129)	0.850 (0.649-1.114)	0.785 (0.601-1.027)
Age	1.215 (0.939-1.573)	0.722 (0.289-1.807)	1.105 (0.457-2.672)
Gender (girl)^c	1.485 (0.609-3.617)	1.443 (0.562-3.705)	0.356 (0.142-0.892)
Family Affluence (high)^d	1.141 (0.479-2.718)	0.805 (0.205-3.158)	1.448 (0.379-5.528)

°p < .1; *p < .05; **p < .01.
Reference category = 0; ^a0 = not victimized by traditional aggression, 1 = victimized by traditional aggression; ^b0 = not victimized by cyber aggression, 1 = victimized by cyber aggression; ^c0 = boy, 1 = girl; ^d0 = low and medium FAS, 1 = high FAS.
Model 1: -2LL = 131.747; Nagelkerke R² = 0.081; Model χ²(1) = 6.242, p = 0.012.
Model 2: -2LL = 112.982; Nagelkerke R² = 0.028; Model χ²(1) = 1.746; p = 0.186.
Model 3: -2LL = 133.929; Nagelkerke R² = 0.059; Model χ²(1) = 4.541; p = 0.033.
Model 4: -2LL = 133.204; Nagelkerke R² = 0.016; Model χ²(1) = 1.180; p = 0.277.
Model 5: -2LL = 115.059; Nagelkerke R² = 0.003; Model χ²(1) = 0.197; p = 0.658.
Model 6: -2LL = 135.411; Nagelkerke R² = 0.001; Model χ²(1) = 0.078; p = 0.780.
Model 7: -2LL = 123.605; Nagelkerke R² = 0.126; Model χ²(5) = 9.616; p = 0.087.
Model 8: -2LL = 109.315; Nagelkerke R² = 0.067; Model χ²(5) = 4.286; p = 0.509.
Model 9: -2LL = 119.773; Nagelkerke R² = 0.185; Model χ²(5) = 14.440; p = 0.013.

ISSN: 1471-2458