Skip to main content

Table 4 Objectively measured physical activity intensities and types between intervention and control schools at the three time points

From: Evaluating the effects of the Lunchtime Enjoyment Activity and Play (LEAP) school playground intervention on children’s quality of life, enjoyment and participation in physical activity

Physical activity measure

Baseline

Post-test (7-Weeks)

Follow-up (8-Months)

Direct observation (Intensity)

Percentage comparison of mean children in each physical activity intensity within direct observation scans#

 

Intervention

Control

p

Intervention

Control

p

Intervention

Control*

p

Sedentary behaviour (%)

7.4 (61.5)

9.7 (61.5)

0.99

6.7 (43.6)

8.0 (49.2)

<0.01

5.5 (40.0)

7.1 (55.2)

<0.001

Moderate physical activity (%)

3.5 (28.8)

4.3 (27.5)

0.61

4.3 (28.1)

4.7 (28.7)

0.80

5.3 (39.1)

3.9 (30.1)

<0.001

Vigorous physical activity (%)

1.2 (9.7)

1.7 (11.0)

0.66

4.3 (28.3)

3.6 (22.1)

<0.01

2.9 (20.9)

1.9 (14.7)

0.01

Direct observation (Activity)

Percentage comparison of the predominant activity type within direct observation scans #

Intervention

Control

p

Intervention

Control

p

Intervention

Control *

p

Australian rules football (%)

-

12 (5.0)

-

11 (8.8)

54 (22.5)

0.30

-

6 (1.9)

-

Baseball/Softball (%)

-

3 (1.3)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Basketball (%)

-

11 (4.6)

-

-

15 (6.3)

-

-

3 (1.0)

-

Cricket (%)

5 (4.0)

3 (1.3)

0.83

1 (0.8)

-

-

2 (1.6)

-

-

Down-ball (%)

-

36 (15.0)

-

-

1 (0.4)

-

-

-

-

Imaginative play (Fixed equipment) (%)

-

69 (28.7)

-

-

70 (29.2)

-

-

76 (24.4)

-

Imaginative play (No equipment) (%)

7 (5.6)

12 (5.0)

0.95

7 (5.6)

7 (2.8)

0.79

4 (3.2)

6 (2.6)

0.96

Imaginative play movable/recycled materials (%)

-

-

-

66 (52.8)

-

-

30 (24.0)

-

-

Construction with recycled materials (%)

-

-

-

16 (12.8)

-

-

33 (26.4)

-

-

No identifiable activity (%)

59 (47.2)

70 (29.2)

0.04

9 (7.2)

37 (15.4)

0.52

7 (5.6)

78 (25.0)

0.25

Play with loose sports equipment (%)

-

-

-

-

9 (3.8)

-

-

40 (12.8)

-

Racquet sports (%)

10 (8.0)

4 (1.7)

0.66

-

-

-

-

-

-

Sandpit play (%)

12 (9.6)

-

-

-

33 (13.8)

-

6 (4.8)

39 (12.5)

0.58

Soccer (%)

32 (25.6)

18 (7.4)

0.18

15 (12.0)

14 (5.8)

0.56

43 (34.4)

62 (19.8)

0.09

Total lunchtime target setting scans (%)

125 (100)

240 (100)

-

125 (100)

240 (100)

-

125 (100)

320 (100)

-

  1. #The p values are based on Chi-square test for comparing proportions between intervention and control schools; *Two more lunchtime target defined areas were introduced at the control school during follow-up; Intervention school lunchtime = 30 minutes; Control school lunchtime = 45 minutes; Direct observation utilised SOPLAY [61].