Study | Subjects (Age, Male) | Outcome | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Marini [25] | N = 153 | CCA-IMT | Mean CCA-IMT: MHO = 0.79 (0.08) vs. MHNW = 0.61 (0.11) p < 0.001 |
MHO = NR (35, 0%) | |||
MHNW = 73 (34, 0%) | |||
Stefan [26] | N = 314 | CCA-IMT | Mean CCA-IMT: MHO = 0.54 (0.02) vs. MHNW = 0.51 (0.02) p = NS |
MHO = 31 (47, 39%) | |||
MHNW = 54 (45, 17%) | |||
Irace [29] | N = 1842 (30–80 years old, 55%) MHO = NR | CCA-IMT | Mean CCA-IMT: MHO = NR vs. MHNW = NR |
MHNW = NR | • AdjustedA OR of CCA-IMT MetS: 1.42 (1.10-1.83) p = 0.01BMI: p = NS | ||
Khan [27] | N = 475 | CCA-IMT | Mean CCA- IMT: MHO = 0.68 (0.09) vs. MHNW =0.64 (0.08) p < 0.001 |
MHO = 260 (51, 0%) | aPWV | Mean aPWV: MHO = 809.9 (182.3) vs. MHNW =731 (176.4) p < 0.001 | |
MHNW = 145 (51, 0%) | CAC | Frequency (%) with increased CAC: MHO = 53 (20%) vs. MHNW =13 (9%) p < 0.001 | |
AC | Frequency (%) with increased AC: MHO = 130 (50%) vs. MHNW =47 (32%) p < 0.001 | ||
•AdjustedB OR's of CAC and AC associated with MHO vs. MHNW CAC: 2.38 (1.20,4.70) p = 0.01; AC: 2.37 (1.49.3.80) p < 0.001 | |||
•AdjustedB regression coefficients associated with MHO vs. MHNW CCA-IMT: 0.034 p < 0.001; aPWV: 59.7 p = 0.001 | |||
Park [28] | N = 2540 MHO = 71 (52, 45%) | CCA-IMT | Mean CCA IMT: MHO = 0.72 (0.06) vs. MHNW = 0.70 (0.06) p = NS |
MHNW = 286 (52, 52%) | aPWV | Mean aPWV: MHO = 12.8 (1.1) vs. MHNW = 12.9 (1.6) p = NS | |
LVMI | Mean LVMI: MHO = 42.4 (7.4) vs. MHNW = 35.4 (6.6) p < 0.01 | ||
E/A ratio | Mean E/A ratio: MHO = 1.17 (0.34) vs. MHNW = 1.34 (0.41) p < 0.05 |