Using environmental health officers’ opinions to inform the source attribution of enteric disease: further analysis of the “most likely source of infection”
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Sep 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Oct 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marilyn Lee|
|30 Oct 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cameron Clark|
|28 Nov 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Nesbitt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Nov 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Dec 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Nesbitt|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Dec 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Dec 2014||Editorially accepted|
|11 Dec 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-14-1258|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.