Skip to main content

Table 2 Socio-economic variables and exposure to/participation in intervention activities in intervention villages

From: Implementing effective hygiene promotion: lessons from the process evaluation of an intervention to promote handwashing with soap in rural India

 

Educational status

Occupation

Religion/Caste

Land ownership

 

No education (n = 80)

Primary education (n = 77)

Secondary or higher (n = 16)

Agricultural or other labour (n = 143)

Housewife (n = 15)

Others (n = 11)

Backward and forward castes (n = 119)

Scheduled castes and tribes (n = 43)

Muslims (n = 11)

No lands (n = 52)

Up to 2.5 acres of land (n = 96)

More than 2.5 acres of land (n = 27)

Self-reported exposure to intervention components

Seen an intervention about HWWS

84

70

88

78

79

82

77

81

73

83

76

77

Seen SuperAmma film

85

81

94

85

74

91

85

81

82

88

83

77

Seen skit

87

71

94

82

63

91

82

79

73

90

77

77

Seen HWWS posters with village headman

90

91

100

92

84

100

96

84

73

98

88

89

Seen intervention truck

97

96

100

96

100

100

97

95

100

100

97

92

Heard SuperAmma intervention jingle

98

95

100

96

100

100

98

93

100

96

98

92

Participation in intervention activities

Took the HWWS pledge

86

81

88

85

68

100

85

88

55 1

96 2

81

69

HWWS door sticker or poster at home

32

38

44

37

26

36

37

35

27

22

38

54

  1. 1p <0.05, compared to Hindus.
  2. 2p < 0.01, compared to landowners.