Skip to main content

Table 6 Subset of individuals aged 20 to 59 years with basic or unknown education in different areas of Finland

From: Inverse probability weighting and doubly robust methods in correcting the effects of non-response in the reimbursed medication and self-reported turnout estimates in the ATH survey

Area

Crude mean

(95% CI)*

Weighted mean§

(95% CI)

Difference

Continental Finland

27.8

26.9

28.7

27.7

26.8

28.7

−0.1

Kainuu, Kajaani area

27.0

25.9

28.2

27.3

26.2

28.4

0.3

Kainuu, Kuhmo-Sotkamo

28.0

26.8

29.2

28.1

26.9

29.3

0.1

Kainuu, Upper Kainuu

26.3

25.4

27.3

26.2

25.2

27.1

−0.1

Southern Oulu region

27.1

25.9

28.2

27.0

25.8

28.2

−0.1

Oulu region

26.5

25.7

27.4

26.3

25.5

27.2

−0.2

Turku

27.6

26.9

28.4

27.0

26.3

27.7

−0.6

  1. *95% confidence interval.
  2. §Sampling design (strata, finite population correction, and sampling probabilities and non-response using weights) was accounted for.
  3. Participants aged 20 to 59 years with basic or unknown education in different areas of Finland.