Table 3 The long-term cost-effectiveness of U@Uni results (all results are per person)
Do nothing | U@Uni | Incremental* | |
|---|---|---|---|
Scenario 1: Full development and implementation of U@Uni | |||
Discounted life years | 39.5088 | 39.5096 | 0.0008 |
Discounted QALYs | 33.2426 | 33.2553 | 0.0128 |
Discounted costs | £0.00 | £291.53 | £291.53 |
ICER | - | - | £22,844 |
Net monetary benefit (NMB)** at threshold of £20,000 per QALY | - | - | -£36.30 |
Probability U@Uni is cost-effective at willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY | - | - | 38.18% |
Cost per smoker avoided with U@Uni | - | - | £55,882 |
Scenario 2: Roll-out of U@Uni | |||
Discounted life years | 39.5088 | 39.5096 | 0.0008 |
Discounted QALYs | 33.2426 | 33.2553 | 0.0128 |
Discounted costs | £0.00 | £19.71 | £19.71 |
ICER | - | - | £1,545 |
Net monetary benefit (NMB)** at threshold of £20,000 per QALY | - | - | £236 |
Probability U@Uni is cost-effective at willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY | - | - | 96.54% |
Cost per smoker avoided with U@Uni | - | - | £3,778 |
Threshold cost analysis | |||
U@Uni price | ICER | Probability U@Uni is cost-effective at £20 K threshold | |
£0 | £0 | 97.64% | |
£5 | £392 | 97.56% | |
£10 | £784 | 97.32% | |
£25 | £1,959 | 96.26% | |
£50 | £3,918 | 94.34% | |
£100 | £7,836 | 87.36% | |
£150 | £11,754 | 77.54% | |
£200 | £15,672 | 64.38% | |
£255 | £19,981 | 48.24% | |