Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of studies reporting case fatality for inpatient treatment of SAM according to WHO protocol

From: Treatment of severe and moderate acute malnutrition in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi process

Study

Country

Study Design

Intervention

Variance from WHO protocol and study design issues

CFR for inpatient group

Bachou 2008

Uganda

Before and after

Improved practice to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions and IV infusions was in accordance with the WHO guidelines

Micronutrients and parenteral antibiotics given in accordance with Ministry of Health recommendations; measles vaccine and sensory stimulation not mentioned

25%

Berti 2008

Ethiopia

Retrospective cohort

Treated according to adapted UNICEF (2004) guidelines

Not clear if micronutrient supplementation aligns with WHO protocol; sensory stimulation not mentioned

7%

Chinkhumba 2008, Fergusson 2009

Malawi

Prospective cohort

Nutritional rehabilitation in accordance with Malawi Ministry of Health guidelines (2003), adapted from WHO guidelines (2003)

HIV-infected children not given ART; unclear approach to rehydration, provision of micronutrients, antibiotics and sensory stimulation; children with severe complications not included

HIV-infected: 35% HIV-uninfected: 10%

Hossain 2009

Bangladesh

Quasi-experimental

Treated according to WHO protocol

Protocol not described

7%

Manary 2000

Malawi

Prospective cohort

Treated according to 1971 WHO standards

Children fed at slower rate; did not use ReSoMal ORS; included an additional intensive nursing component; measles vaccination not mentioned

25%

Maitland 2006

Kenya

Retrospective cohort

Treated according to WHO guidelines insofar as staffing allowed

Fed at a higher rate initially; authors state that WHO protocol used but not described in detail.

19%

Ahmed 1999

Bangladesh

Prospective cohort

Adapted WHO criteria

Children fed at slower rate; all children had diarrhea; acute malnutrition assessed using either WFH or WFA

9%

Khanum 1994 and 1998

Bangladesh

cRCT

Protocol not described

High risk of bias with respect to randomization; carers often requested to change groups

3.40%

Ashworth 2004

South Africa

Prospective cohort

Managed according to WHO guidelines insofar as staffing permitted

Age range of children not given; unclear if all children have SAM as defined by WHO

24%

  1. WHO: World Health Organization
  2. UNICEF: United Nations Children’s Fund
  3. HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus
  4. cRCT: Cluster randomized controlled trial
  5. WFH: weight-for-height
  6. WFA: weight-for-age
  7. ORS: oral rehydration solution