Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of findings for effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on ‘no breastfeeding’ rates.

From: Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review

Quality Assessment

Summary of Findings

 

Directness

No of events

  

No of Studies

Design

Limitations

Consistency

Generalizability to population of interest

Generalizability to intervention of interest

Intervention

Control

Relative Risk (95% CI)

Comments

Rate of no breastfeeding at day 1: low outcome-specific quality

38

21 RCTs, 17 QE [11, 13, 14, 17, 33, 36, 37, 44, 49, 59, 63, 64, 68–71, 74, 78, 79, 89–91, 96, 100, 103, 107, 108, 110, 111, 113, 117, 120–122, 124–127]

Variable follow up periods used in studies. Recall criteria variable across studies (past 24 hr, past week or previous month).

Most studies suggest benefit. Significant heterogeneity

10 of 38 studies were conducted in developing countries

Pooled results for different types of interventions

48026

39843

0.68 [0.54, 0.87]

Random effects meta-analysis due to significant heterogeneity

Most studies used individual counseling and most were facility and community-based.

Effect of benefit refers to decrease in numbers not breastfeeding.

Rate of no breastfeeding at <1 month : low outcome-specific quality

33

21 RCTs, 12 QE [10, 18, 19, 38, 45, 52, 53, 61, 63, 66, 68, 71–74, 76, 88, 90, 91, 93, 95, 98, 99, 101–103, 106, 113, 117, 118, 120, 124, 128]

Variable follow up periods used in studies. Recall criteria variable across studies (past 24 hr, past week or previous month).

10 of 33 studies suggest benefit. Significant heterogeneity

4 of 33 studies were conducted in developing countries

Pooled results for different types of interventions

770

1018

0.70 [0.62, 0.80]

Random effects meta-analysis due to significant heterogeneity.

Most studies used individual counseling.

Rate of no breastfeeding at 1-5 months : low outcome-specific quality

73

41 RCTs, 32 QE [10, 12, 13, 17–20, 35, 36, 38, 40–42, 44, 45, 47, 49, 51, 52, 54, 58, 59, 61–64, 67–69, 71–74, 76, 78–83, 86, 90–93, 95–99, 101, 103–106, 108–110, 112–121, 123, 124, 126, 129, 130]

Variable follow up periods used in studies. Recall criteria variable across studies (past 24 hr, past week or previous month).

25 of 73 studies suggest benefit. Significant heterogeneity

16 of 73 studies were conducted in developing countries

Pooled results for different types of interventions

15473

17578

0.82 [0.77, 0.89]

Random effects meta-analysis due to significant heterogeneity

Most studies used individual counseling.