Skip to main content

Table 6 Individual scores and ranking of interventions under the emergence scenario in the control (CONT) model for two stakeholders showing distinctive positions in the GAIA decision map (stakeholder 6 (S6) and stakeholder 8 (S8))

From: Multi-criteria decision analysis as an innovative approach to managing zoonoses: results from a study on Lyme disease in Canada

Intervention

Group rank

Score S6

Rank S6

Score S8

Rank S8

CONT0

1

0.53

1

0.3

3

CONT11

2

0.33

3

0.32

2

CONT3a

3

0.24

5

0.37

1

CONT10

5

0.37

2

0.15

5

CONT12

6

0.29

4

0.07

7

CONT4

8

−0.15

9

0.19

4

CONT1a

9

−0.11

8

0.09

6

CONT7

9

−0.18

11

0.02

9

CONT3b

10

−0.06

7

0.05

8

CONT1b

11

−0.22

12

0.02

9

CONT2

12

−0.04

6

−0.18

11

CONT5

13

−0.17

10

−0.12

10

CONT8

14

−0.26

13

−0.3

13

CONT9

14

−0.26

13

−0.3

13

CONT6a

15

−0.04

6

−0.37

14

CONT6b

16

−0.27

14

−0.29

12