Skip to main content

Table 4 Stakeholder weights (S1 to S8) under the emergence (EM) and the epidemic scenario (EP) for the surveillance (SURV) and control (CONT) models

From: Multi-criteria decision analysis as an innovative approach to managing zoonoses: results from a study on Lyme disease in Canada

Criteria Weights
SURV model
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8
EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP
SUC SUC1 13 13 13 13 21 21 20 21 12 18 25 23 2 3 7 8
SUC2 13 13 13 13 14 0 20 21 12 18 8 11 8 12 21 16
SUC3 13 13 15 15 14 18 16 6 12 18 4 17 25 38 21 32
SUC4 13 13 10 10 21 21 24 12 24 18 26 11 5 3 21 24
Total 50 50 50 50 70 60 80 60 60 70 63 63 40 60 70 80
SEC SEC1 9 9 15 15 9 8 6 8 10 6 3 2 20 13 6 6
SEC2 9 9 15 15 0 0 2 2 10 6 10 10 20 13 6 4
SEC3 13 13 15 15 9 16 6 16 10 12 10 10 10 7 6 6
SEC4 19 19 5 5 12 16 6 14 10 6 15 15 10 7 12 4
Total 50 50 50 50 30 40 20 40 40 30 37 37 60 40 30 20
Total 100
Criteria CONT model
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8
EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP EM EP
PHC PHC1 8 8 21 21 20 25 12 20 16 25 10 4 25 35 30 30
PHC2 8 8 3 3 8 13 9 8 12 13 3 6 5 5 10 10
PHC3 8 8 6 6 12 13 9 12 12 13 8 16 10 10 10 10
Total 25 25 30 30 40 50 30 40 40 50 21 26 40 50 50 50
AEC AEC 1 13 13 15 10 5 3 13 13 5 5 13 14 15 15 10 10
AEC 2 13 13 15 10 5 3 13 13 5 5 13 14 10 10 10 10
Total 25 25 30 20 10 5 25 25 10 10 26 29 25 25 20 20
SIC SIC 1 18 18 5 10 10 4 15 10 13 10 4 4 10 10 11 9
SIC 2 8 8 5 10 10 6 10 15 13 10 4 9 5 5 5 6
Total 25 25 10 20 20 10 25 25 25 20 8 13 15 15 15 15
SEC SEC1 3 3 8 8 5 4 6 2 5 3 15 10 6 3 3 2
SEC2 3 3 8 8 0 0 2 1 3 2 15 5 6 3 3 2
SEC3 5 5 6 6 6 11 4 3 5 6 1 8 3 1 2 3
SEC4 9 9 3 3 11 11 4 2 5 4 8 4 2 1 4 3
SEC5 5 5 6 6 9 11 4 2 8 5 6 5 3 2 4 5
Total 25 25 30 30 30 35 20 10 25 20 45 32 20 10 15 15
Total 100
  1. Bold font indicates the weight totals of criteria within each category.
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us