Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Development of a comprehensive list of criteria for evaluating consumer education materials on colorectal cancer screening

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Maren Dreier
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
15 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annalisa Rosso
5 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - C Escoffery
25 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Maren Dreier
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annalisa Rosso
1 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
20 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - C Escoffery
27 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Maren Dreier
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
13 Sep 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-843

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement